Summary. The assessment of aerobic capacity is carried out based on indicators of physical work capacity (PWC 170 ), and maximal oxygen consumption (VO 2 max ). Physical health is evaluated using the maximal oxygen consumption indicator. Both endogenous and exogenous factors can influence the population's physical health level. This influence may be determined by the social status of the region's residents, their traditions, as well as the climatic and landscape characteristics of the area, among other factors.

Some scientific studies suggest that certain regions differ in terms of the morphological characteristics of their inhabitants, which, in turn, determines the peculiarities of the functioning of their organs and body systems. Therefore, to study and analyze the level of physical health of residents in specific areas, our research included an investigation of the aerobic performance characteristics of young men from the mountainous regions of the Zakarpattia region, depending on their somatotype.

The level of physical health was assessed using indicators of aerobic capacity, evaluating the ability of young males-mountain to adapt to performing physical work in an aerobic mode. For this purpose, we used the cycle ergometry method, which allowed us to determine PWC 170 and VO 2 max based on the Karpman et al. methodology. The somatotype was determined according to the Heath-Carter method.

By studying the aerobic capacity of 124 young males-mountain in the post-pubertal stage of ontogenesis, aged 17 to 21, we observed significant differences in PWC 170 and VO 2 max among representatives of different somatotypes. Individuals with an endomesomorphic and balanced somatotype demonstrated a «below average» level of aerobic performance and a health status below the «safe level». In contrast, individuals with ectomorphic, mesomorphic, and mesoectomorphic somatotypes exhibited an «average» level of aerobic performance and a health status above the «safe level».

Ключові слова: maximal oxygen consumption, physical work capacity, somatotype

Повний текст: PDF (Ukr)

1. Andriychuk VM. Comparative characteristics of somatometric body parameters of men of the first mature period of residents of different natural and geographical zones of Ukraine. Biomedical and biosocial anthropology. 2009;3:111-114. (In Ukrainian).
2. Apanasenko G.L, Popova L.A, Magliovaniy A.V. Sanolohiya [Sanology]. Kyiv-Lviv: PP Kvart; 2011, 303 p. (In Ukrainian).
3. Astrand J. Aerobic work capacity in men and women with special reference to age. Acta Physical. Scand. 1960;49(169):1-92.
4. Carter J. The Heath-Carter antropometric somatotype. Instruction manual / Carter J.; [revised by J. E. L. Carter]. Department of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences San Diego State University. CA. U.S.A., March 2003. 26 p.
5. Cooper H. Aerobics Program For Total Well-Being: Exercise, Diet, And Emotional Balance. New York: Bantam Books. 2013. 224 p.
6. Dulo O, Furman Y, Hema-Bahyna N. Gender and Somatotypological Peculiarities of Indicators of Aerobic and Anaerobic Productivity of Energy Supply of the Body in the Post-Pubertal Period of Ontogenesis in the Residents of the Zakarpattia Region. Wiadomości Lekarskie. 2022; LXXV(10):2359-2365.doi.org/10.36740/WLek202210108
7. Fera MO, Fera OV, Kryvanych VM, et al. Analysis of Environmental and Person-Oriented Factors Influence on Dental Caries Intensity among Children Population of Transcarpathia. J Int Dent Med Res. 2020; 13(4):1326-1333.
8. Furman YuM, Miroshnichenko VM, Drachuk SP. Promising models of physical culture and health technologies in physical education of students of higher educational institutions. Kyiv: Olympic literature; 2013, p. 24-42. (In Ukrainian).
9. Furman YM, Miroshnichenko VM, Bohuslavska VYu, et al. Modeling of functional preparedness of women 25-35 years of different somatotypes. Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports. 2022; 26(2):118-125.doi.org/10.15561/26649837.2022.0206
10. Kosma M, Ellis R, Cardinal B, et al. Psychosocial Predictors of Physical Activity and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Adults with Physical Disabilities: An Integrative Framework. Disability and Health Journal. 2009;2:104-109.doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2008.10.062
11. Larry Kenney W, Wilmore JH, Costill DL. Physiology of Sport and Exercise. Human Kinetics; 2021. 611 p.
12. Miroshnichenko VM, Furman YuM, Brezdeniuk OYu, et al. Correlation of maximum oxygen consumption with component composition of the body, body mass of men with different somatotypes aged 25-35. Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports. 2020;6:290-297. doi.org/10.15561/26649837.2020.0603
13. Mucha DK, Pałka T, Skalska-Izdebska R. et al. Aerobic Capacity in Relation to Selected Elements of Body Posture. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(2):903. doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20020903
14. Wu Y, Ma Z. Exercise Intervention Based on Behavioral Change Theory: Influence on Body Morphology and Body Composition. Altern Ther Health Med. 2023; 29(1):150-155.